Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 7/29/2015

Gortat v. Capala Bros.

Citations

  • 795 F.3d 292
  • 25 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 8
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13179
  • 2015 WL 4546219

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “because § 216(b) does not explicitly authorize awards reimbursing plaintiffs for expert fees, the district court erred in granting such an award pursuant to this provision.”
  • listing statutes that explicitly allow courts to award expert witness fees
  • not allowing recovery for expert witness fees where § 1920 did not allow them
  • not allowing recovery for expert witness fees where § 1920 did not allow them
  • “The Supreme Court has made clear on multiple occasions that, absent explicit statutory authorization, a district court may not award reimbursement for expert fees beyond the allowances authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1920, as limited by 28 U.S.C. § 1821.”
  • noting Circuit Court of Appeals' consensus on the issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Calabresi, Livingston, Straub

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.