Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. LY USA, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an “award of attorney’s fees is available under [§] 1117(a) in ‘exceptional’ cases even for those plaintiffs who opt to receive statutory damages under [§] 1117(c)”
• holding that an “award of attorney’s fees is available under [§] 1117(a) in ‘exceptional’ cases even for those plaintiffs who opt to receive statutory damages under [§] 1117(c)”
• holding that it was not an abuse of discretion to deny a stay to defendants who had been indicted in a parallel criminal proceeding where other factors weighed against the stay
• recognizing that indictment in parallel criminal proceeding “supported the entry of a stay”
• recognizing that indictment in parallel criminal proceeding “supported the entry of a stay”
• noting that “[t]he criminal proceeding involved the same subject matter as the civil action[,]” which “supported the entry of a stay”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).