Skip to main content
· 2/3/2004

Gormley v. Robertson

Citations

  • 83 P.3d 1042

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \findings of fact are entitled to deference while conclusions of law are reviewed de novo\
  • \findings of fact are entitled to deference while conclusions of law are reviewed de novo\
  • “findings of fact are entitled to deference while conclusions of law are reviewed de novo”
  • extending meretricious relationship doctrine to same sex couples
  • property distribution following end of same-sex meretricious relationship
  • property distribution following end of same-sex meretricious relationship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kato

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.