Third Circuit· 2/21/2014

Edward Seamans v. Temple University

Citations

744 F.3d 853
2014 WL 658401
2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 3189

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that when assessing the reasonableness of an investigation, a factfinder must balance the potential harm from inaccuracy against the burden to the furnisher
holding that information is “inaccurate” for purposes of the FCRA if it is “misleading in such a way and to such an extent that [it] can be expected to have an adverse effect”
holding that “FCRA explicitly precludes private suits for failure to comply with [§ 1681-2(a) ], 15 U.S.C. § 1681s-2(c), and instead provides for enforcement of that provision by federal and state officials, 15 U.S.C. § 1681s-2(d).”
stating that the reasonableness of a consumer reporting agency’s procedure is normally a question for trial
stating that “where a given notice contains only scant or vague allegations of inaccuracy, a more limited investigation may be warranted.”
stating that “where a given notice contains only scant or vague allegations of inaccuracy, a more limited investigation may be warranted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vanaskie, Chagares, Yanaskie, Shwartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.