Gorman v. Walmart Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that once actual ice and snow removal has begun, there is a duty to do so in a non-negligent manner
• declining to apply the Massachusetts Rule because owner had cleared its sidewalk after the freezing rain had ceased but before the plaintiff fell
• evidence that the condition of the sidewalk where the plaintiff fell had been altered by applying salt prior to the time he fell provided a basis for a finding that Wal-mart had assumed a duty to plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).