Skip to main content
· 9/22/1998

Emery v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Citations

  • 976 S.W.2d 439
  • 1998 Mo. LEXIS 65
  • 1998 WL 652162

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing issue of damages is generally for the finder of fact, who is in a superior position to evaluate allegations of harm
  • explaining the jury's \superior opportunity\ to evaluate the plaintiff's injuries and damages is a factor in determining if an award is \excessive\
  • plaintiff with possible need for future surgery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, Limbaugh, White, Holstein, Parrish, Benton, Covington, Wolff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.