Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 11/17/2003
Goodwin v. Johnson
Citations
- 591 S.E.2d 34
- 357 S.C. 49
- 2003 S.C. App. LEXIS 174
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- relocating an ease ment of necessity while suggesting that express easements require mutual consent to be relocated
- relocating an easement of necessity while suggesting that express easements require mutual consent to be relocated
- court may relocate easement of necessity when evidence supports such relocation
- adopting Restatement position for easements by necessity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Goolsby, Connor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- M.P.M. Builders, LLC v. DwyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2004-06-15· cited 64×
- Sweezey v. NeelSupreme Court of Vermont· 2006-05-05· cited 26×
- Murrells Inlet Corp. v. WardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-05-02· cited 19×
- Carlson v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont· 2009-02-13· cited 14×
- Town of Ellettsville, Indiana Plan Commission and Richland Convenience Store Partners, LLC. v. Joseph v. DeSpiritoIndiana Court of Appeals· 2017-05-25· cited 3×
- Sheppard v. Justin EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-05-14· cited 2×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-01-22· cited 749×
- Tupper v. Dorchester CountySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-06-30· cited 175×
- Soderberg v. WeiselSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-01-07· cited 62×
- Eldridge v. City of GreenwoodCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-06-15· cited 40×
- Samuelson v. AlvaradoTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1993-01-13· cited 36×
- Jowers v. HornsbySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-06-08· cited 35×
- Binkley v. Rabon Creek Watershed Conservation DistrictCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-11-19· cited 34×
- Slear v. HannaSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-02-17· cited 34×
- Smith v. Commissioners of Public WorksCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-02-07· cited 31×
- Hancock v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-07-24· cited 29×
- MacMeekin v. Low Income Housing Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2002-04-15· cited 28×
- Revis v. BarrettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-02-20· cited 17×
- Hartley v. John Wesley United Methodist ChurchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-05-27· cited 14×
- Michael v. NeedhamCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1978-04-14· cited 9×
- Pittman v. LowtherCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-08-04· cited 5×
- Lighthouse Tennis Club Village Horizontal Property Regime LXVI v. South Island Public Service DistrictCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-07-21· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.