Supreme Court of South Carolina· 6/30/1997

Tupper v. Dorchester County

Citations

487 S.E.2d 187
326 S.C. 318
1997 S.C. LEXIS 129

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an issue must be raised to and ruled upon by the trial court to be preserved for appellate review
explaining that appellant cannot bootstrap an issue for appeal by way of a co-defendant’s objection
noting summary judgment is not appropriate where further inquiry into the facts of the case is desirable to clarify the application of the law
holding in order to effectuate a public dedication, the owner must express in a positive and unmistakable manner the intention to dedicate his property to public use and there must be acceptance of such property by the public
finding since it is an action in equity, the Court may take its own view of the evidence
stating an appellant cannot bootstrap an issue for appeal by way of a co-defendant's objection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waller, Finney, Toal, Moore, Burnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

122 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.