Goodman v. Kotzen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, although both the plaintiffs and joining defendants alleged professional malpractice claims, joinder was not proper because the claims alleged different factual bases
• ex- tending Muhammad to cases in which a third party alleges the attorney malpractice
• malpractice action allowed against attorney who did not consummate settlement, but not allowed as to attorneys who did

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McMahon v. Shea
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-02-23· cited 19×
• WASSALL v. DeCARO
  Third Circuit· 1996-07-29· cited 8×
• United States Fire Insurance v. American National Fire Insurance
  Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas· 2001-04-06

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Muhammad v. Strassburger, McKenna, Messer, Shilobod & Gutnick
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-03-15· cited 181×
• Tunica-Biloxi Tribe v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1991-10-07· cited 79×
• American States Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-07-21· cited 77×
• Wnek v. Boyle
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1953-05-25· cited 25×
• Austin J. Richards, Inc. v. McClafferty
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-01-04· cited 22×
• Miller v. Berschler
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-01-22· cited 21×
• Somers v. Gross
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-03-28· cited 17×
• Olson v. Grutza
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-08-31· cited 17×
• DICKSON v. LEWANDOWSKI
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1974-06-21· cited 12×
• Gordon v. Sokolow
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-05-26· cited 6×