WASSALL v. DeCARO

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the plaintiff agreed to drop claims where the defendant agreed to drop counterclaim
• predicting that we would not apply Muhammad when an attorney “has neglected his role as steward, hopelessly delaying, and perhaps prohibiting, the system from properly resolving his client’s case”
• applying Pennsylvania law and holding that the Muhammad decision would not bar a legal malpractice claim after settlement where an attorney “has neglected his role as steward, hopelessly delaying, and perhaps prohibiting, the system from properly resolving his client’s case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).