Skip to main content
E.D. New York· 10/17/2014

Goodman v. AssetMark, Inc.

Citations

  • 53 F. Supp. 3d 583
  • 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148198
  • 2014 WL 5302962

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying reconsideration because prior opinion “remains good law after” Supreme Court decision
  • denying motion for reconsideration of dismissal under SLUSA, noting “Troice does not stand for the broad proposition that SLUSA cannot apply whenever the defendant accused of fraud, instead of the plaintiff, was the one who purchased the covered securities.”
  • “The term ‘covered security’ includes mutual funds that are issued by a registered investment company.”
  • “Troice does not stand for the broad proposition that SLUSA cannot apply whenever the defendant accused of fraud, instead of the plaintiff, was the one who purchased the covered securities”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bianco

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.