· 6/29/2010
Romano v. Kazacos
Citations
- 609 F.3d 512
- 49 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1601
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 13220
- 2010 WL 2574143
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that it is permissible to look to materials outside the pleadings if subject matter jurisdiction is contested
- affirming dismissal of breach of contract claim premised upon misrepresentations or omissions
- SLUSA preclusion is appropriate where “plaintiff’s claims . . . ‘rest on’ the purchase or sale of securities.”
- “SLUSA requires our attention to both the pleadings and the realities underlying the claims.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Parker, Wesley, Restani
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.