Gonzalez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[Rule 3.853(b)(4)] is written in the alternative: the movant must allege that identification is a genuinely disputed issue or he must explain how the DNA evidence would exonerate him.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• JOSEPH BING v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-12-12· cited 2×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bates v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2009-01-30· cited 20×
• Crow v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-02-19· cited 4×
• Helton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-11-22· cited 4×