Gonzalez v. State
Citations
- 2025 ND 109
Syllabus
Generally, attacking an expired sentence is a moot argument. When the criminal judgment does not include a term of probation, the expired sentence does not continue to have collateral consequences. When a term of imprisonment has been completed, any additional credit for time served is academic and irrelevant. The Court does not render advisory opinions, and an appeal will be dismissed if the issues become moot or academic, leaving no actual controversy to be determined.
Judges: McEvers, Lisa K. Fair
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lane v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1982-05-03· cited 490×
- State v. WardnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-12-18· cited 32×
- Kahl v. DIRECTOR, NORTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-07-17· cited 24×
- State v. McGinnisNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2022-03-03· cited 14×
- Dubois v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-08-19· cited 12×
- State v. LarsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2023-08-02· cited 8×
- State v. MosesNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2022-11-23· cited 6×
- State v. GonzalezNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2024-01-10· cited 5×
- Schwartzenberger v. McKenzie County Board of County CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-08-29· cited 4×
- Interest of M.R.North Dakota Supreme Court· 2022-03-31· cited 4×
- Lowe v. WSINorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2017-01-26· cited 3×
- State v. OshiroNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2022-05-12· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.