Skip to main content

Gonzales v. State

Citations

  • 689 S.W.2d 900
  • 1985 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1365

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, arguing the trial court erred in overruling his motion for new trial on the ground that the verdict rendered is contrary to the law and evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCormick, Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.