Skip to main content

Gonzales v. State

Citations

  • 685 S.W.2d 47
  • 1985 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1205

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that question introducing evidence of prior criminal charge without showing of final conviction could be cured by instruction to disregard
  • holding that question introducing evidence of prior criminal charge without showing of final conviction could be cured by instruction to disregard
  • noting that “[f]or error to be preserved with regard to the subject matter of the motion in limine it is absolutely necessary that an objection be made at the time when the subject is raised during trial”
  • stating that “for error to be preserved with regard to the subject matter of the motion in limine it is absolutely necessary that an objection be made at the time when the subject is raised during trial”
  • stating that “[f]or error to be preserved with regard to the subject matter of the motion in limine it is absolutely necessary that an objection be made at the time when the subject is raised during trial”
  • granting of motion in limine does not alone preserve error; “absolutely necessary that an objection be made at the time when the subject is raised during the trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Onion, Teague, Clinton, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

127 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.