Gonzales v. Hearst Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a mistake or error in judgment is not enough” for actual malice
• holding it is unreasonable to infer a reporter had willfully published false information when there was a dispute about whether the source in fact provided the information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).