Skip to main content
· 6/8/1983

White v. Southwestern Bell Tel. Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 651 S.W.2d 260
  • 26 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 441
  • 1983 Tex. LEXIS 318

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court erred in granting a directed verdict since there was conflicting evidence as to Appellant’s loss in net profits
  • holding that evidence showed Hewlett-White florist shop had been an established business for thirty-three., years and that the sale of flowers was not an uncertain or speculative business so, ,as to preclude lost-profits award
  • holding that only disputed factual issues are presented to the jury
  • holding a consumer could seek lost profits damages arising from a telephone company’s incorrect listing of his telephone number in the yellow pages
  • noting that pre-existing profits are admissible to show projected lost profits with reasonable certainty
  • noting that pre-existing profits are admissible to show projected lost profits with reasonable certainty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.