D. North Carolina· 3/17/2006
Gonzales v. Google, Inc.
Citations
- 234 F.R.D. 674
- 64 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 393
- 79 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1832
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13412
- 2006 WL 778720
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Google had to comply with a third-party subpoena and provide data sought by the government despite the fact that it would require Google to create new code to format and extract query and URL data from many computer banks
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ware
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jewish War Veterans of the United States of America, Inc. v. GatesDistrict of Columbia· 2007-09-18· cited 48×
- ATS Products, Inc. v. Champion Fiberglass, Inc.N.D. California· 2015-09-14· cited 33×
- United States v. Golden Valley Electric AssociationNinth Circuit· 2012-08-07· cited 30×
- Meredith v. United Collection Bureau, Inc.N.D. Ohio· 2017-04-13· cited 28×
- Innovative Therapies, Inc. v. MeentsD. Maryland· 2014-03-04· cited 17×
- In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust LitigationN.D. California· 2012-04-16· cited 13×
- Edeh v. Equifax Information Services, LLCD. Minnesota· 2013-08-05· cited 13×
- Xcentric Ventures, L.L.C. v. BorodkinD. Arizona· 2013-03-20· cited 8×
- Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition v. Elk Run Coal Co.S.D. West Virginia· 2013-04-11· cited 8×
- Subpoena of DJO, LLC v. HunterS.D. California· 2014-01-15· cited 7×
- Ogden v. Bumble Bee Foods, LLCN.D. California· 2013-04-16· cited 6×
- Sams v. GA West Gate, LLCN.D. Georgia· 2016-09-13· cited 6×
- Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. v. Kozumi USA Corp.N.D. Florida· 2013-01-28· cited 4×
- State of Delaware, Department of Finance v. AT&T, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2020-07-10
- Conaway v. H & R Block Eastern Enterprises, Inc.S.D. Georgia· 2017-02-15
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court· 1947-01-13· cited 4,981×
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court· 1984-05-21· cited 1,798×
- Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court· 2004-06-29· cited 419×
- Federal Open Market Committee of Federal Reserve System v. MerrillSupreme Court· 1979-06-28· cited 309×
- Heat & Control, Inc. v. Hester Industries, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1986-03-04· cited 193×
- Truswal Systems Corp. v. Hydro-Air Engineering, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1987-03-11· cited 186×
- Northwestern Memorial Hospital v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesSeventh Circuit· 2004-03-26· cited 167×
- Leonard J. Klay, M.D. v. AllEleventh Circuit· 2005-09-16· cited 147×
- Dart Industries Company, Inc., Movant-Appellee v. Westwood Chemical Company, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 1980-04-02· cited 92×
- Moon v. SCP Pool Corp.C.D. California· 2005-12-07· cited 89×
- Paul Laxalt v. C.K. McClatchyD.C. Circuit· 1987-01-20· cited 71×
- In re: Sealed CaseD.C. Circuit· 2004-08-31· cited 68×
- American Civil Liberties Union v. AshcroftThird Circuit· 2003-03-06· cited 63×
- American Civil Liberties Union v. RenoThird Circuit· 2000-06-22· cited 59×
- Gill v. Gulfstream Park Racing Ass'nFirst Circuit· 2005-03-07· cited 55×
- Centurion Industries, Inc. v. Warren SteurerTenth Circuit· 1981-12-02· cited 38×
- Compaq Computer Corp. v. Packard Bell Electronics, Inc.N.D. California· 1995-07-24· cited 36×
- American Civil Liberties Union v. RenoE.D. Pennsylvania· 1999-02-01· cited 34×
- Green v. BacaC.D. California· 2003-12-16· cited 21×
- Upjohn Co. v. Hygieia Biological LaboratoriesE.D. California· 1993-04-28· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.