Heat & Control, Inc. v. Hester Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• listing “the relevance of the discovery sought, the requesting party’s need, and the potential hardship to the subject to the subpoena” as “factors required to be balanced by the trial court in determining the propriety of a subpoena”
• explaining the court’s discretion in setting the limits of discovery and noting the court “must be careful not to deprive a party of discovery that is reasonably necessary to afford a fair opportunity to develop and prepare the case.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).