Skip to main content
· 4/4/2002

Gomez v. ITT Educational Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 71 S.W.3d 542
  • 348 Ark. 69
  • 2002 Ark. LEXIS 180

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the adoption of the Leflar factors in Wallis and subsequent cases appears to be merely a softening of what previously had been a rigid formulaic application of the former rule of law”
  • noting that “the adoption of the Leflar factors in Wallis and subsequent cases appears to be mere ly a softening of what previously had been a rigid formulaic application of the former rule of law”
  • applying Arkansas conflict-of-law principles after determining that the matter at issue was substantive rather than procedural under Arkansas law
  • “[T]he general rule is that a true statute of limitations extinguishes only the right to enforce the remedy and not the substantive right itself.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tom Glaze

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.