Ganey v. Kawasaki Motors Corp., U.S.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that maintenance of interstate order favored applying the law of the state with the “more significant relationship” to the parties
• noting that Arkansas choice-of-law analysis “ha[s] evolved from a simple application of the doctrine of lex loci delicti into a consideration of both that doctrine and Leflar’s five choice-influencing factors”
• reviewing a circuit court’s decision to apply Louisiana law in an appeal from an order of dismissal in a products-liability case
• reviewing a circuit court's decision to apply Louisiana law in an appeal from an order of dismissal in a products-liability case
• overruled on other grounds by Lawson v. Simmons Sporting Goods, Inc., 2019 Ark. 84, 569 S.W.3d 865
• “In this case, the trial court properly considered both the doctrine of lex loci delicti and the five ‘choice-influencing considerations’ promulgated by Professor Leflar . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).