Skip to main content
· 11/15/2005

Colon Ex Rel. Stolyar v. Abbott Laboratories

Citations

  • 397 F. Supp. 2d 405
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27772
  • 2005 WL 3046458

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • excluding expert testimony and granting summary judgment where the expert provided speculative opinions on causation
  • rejecting an expert opinion in part because it was not tested and was “set forth for the first time in his April 2005 affidavit”
  • granting summary judgment where the expert provided speculative opinions on causation
  • “A district court is not required to admit opinion evidence which is ‘connected to existing data only by the ipse dixit of the expert.’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dearie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.