· 11/15/2005
Colon Ex Rel. Stolyar v. Abbott Laboratories
Citations
- 397 F. Supp. 2d 405
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 27772
- 2005 WL 3046458
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- excluding expert testimony and granting summary judgment where the expert provided speculative opinions on causation
- rejecting an expert opinion in part because it was not tested and was “set forth for the first time in his April 2005 affidavit”
- granting summary judgment where the expert provided speculative opinions on causation
- “A district court is not required to admit opinion evidence which is ‘connected to existing data only by the ipse dixit of the expert.’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dearie
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.