Goldy v. Tierney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Petitioner argues that the use of the word ‘for’ connotes intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Williams v. Taylor
  Supreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 15,929×
• Wiggins v. Smith, Warden
  Supreme Court· 2003-06-26· cited 5,961×
• Sullivan v. Louisiana
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 3,512×
• Hilton v. Braunskill
  Supreme Court· 1987-05-26· cited 1,809×
• Morgan v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1992-06-15· cited 1,584×
• Staples v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1994-05-23· cited 1,491×
• Turner v. Louisiana
  Supreme Court· 1965-01-18· cited 1,063×
• Ristaino v. Ross
  Supreme Court· 1976-03-03· cited 642×
• Brooks v. Tennessee
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-07· cited 601×
• Aldridge v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1931-04-20· cited 452×
• Donald Harris v. Clarice Stovall
  Sixth Circuit· 2000-05-18· cited 400×
• Connors v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1895-05-20· cited 257×
• Stacey Barker v. Joan Yukins, in Her Official Capacity as Warden of the Scott Correctional Facility
  Sixth Circuit· 1999-12-15· cited 167×
• Carrie Gentry v. Doris Deuth, Warden, Kentucky Correctional Institute for Women
  Sixth Circuit· 2006-07-31· cited 119×
• People v. Spanke
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2003-03-26· cited 101×
• Adremy Dennis v. Betty Mitchell, Warden
  Sixth Circuit· 2003-12-29· cited 92×
• Victor Turner v. Margaret Bagley
  Sixth Circuit· 2005-03-21· cited 51×
• People v. Nyx
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2007-07-18· cited 47×
• Ward v. Wolfenbarger
  E.D. Michigan· 2004-09-14· cited 35×