Skip to main content

Golden v. State

Citations

  • 509 So. 2d 1149
  • 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1496

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant’s motion for rehearing supplied the information missing from his original postconviction motion in sufficient detail to meet the substantial compliance standard for motions filed under rule 3.850
  • stating “appellant’s counsel should have accurately determined the maximum sentence to which his client would be subjected upon a guilty plea and informed appellant of it before entry of the plea”
  • \A rule 3.850 motion cannot be used to review ordinary trial errors cognizable by means of a direct appeal.\
  • a plea may be withdrawn where the judge abides by the plea agreement but the defendant was induced to enter the plea by a mistake or misunderstanding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zehmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.