Skip to main content
· 2/17/1986

Gold Kist Peanuts v. Alberson

Citations

  • 342 S.E.2d 694
  • 178 Ga. App. 253
  • 1986 Ga. App. LEXIS 1637

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying a credit to an amount owed only reduces the net balance on the liquidated claim; it does not render the claim unliquidated
  • claim not rendered unliquidated though party at summary judgment created factual question as to the total reduction of the total debt owed
  • prejudgment interest unavailable where “the contract itself specified no rate of interest, and ... [the] complaint merely prayed for ‘interest’ without specifying the rate thereof’
  • where there was no dispute as to the specific and certain amount and only disagreement as to whether defendant could enforce an assessment as a reduction against the contract amount, the claim was liquidated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carley, Birdsong, Sognier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.