Kroger Co. v. U. S. Foodservice of Atlanta, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a creditor is not required to produce actual invoices to meet its burden of proof
• consolidated pretrial order “plainly indicated” which party sought prejudgment interest “pursuant to OCGA § 7-4-16 at the rate of 1.5% per month”
• consolidated pretrial order “plainly indicated” which party sought prejudgment interest “pursuant to OCGA § 7- 4-16 at the rate of 1.5% per month”
• “It is axiomatic that damages cannot be left to speculation, conjecture, or guess-work and must be proven with reasonable certainty.”
• the award of statutory attorney fees presents a question in law and “[w]hen the statutory requisites are met, the trial court’s discretion to deny the award is eliminated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).