Godfrey v. Washington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The few cases considering the issue recognize that those parties who are not able to protect themselves should not suffer because the representative, who is responsible for protecting them, has defaulted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jane Doe, a Minor Child, by Next Friend, Leslie G. Fein v. District of Columbia
  D.C. Circuit· 1996-08-27· cited 217×
• In Re: In the Matter of the Fort Totten Metrorail Cases Arising Out of the Events of June 22, 2009
  District of Columbia· 2013-08-08· cited 23×
• In re AK. V.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-03-23· cited 15×
• Haqq v. Dancy-Bey
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-08-13· cited 6×
• In re E.T.A.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-08-11· cited 4×
• Dada v. Children's National Medical Center
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-11-02· cited 2×
• In Re ETA
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-08-11
• Lee v. Seed Public Charter School of Washington, Dc
  District of Columbia· 2021-10-15

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wallace v. Warehouse Employees Union No. 730
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1984-10-12· cited 93×
• Perry v. Sera
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-04-30· cited 46×
• Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Hill
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1969-03-10· cited 33×
• Brandon v. DeBusk
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-07-01· cited 25×
• Berrain v. Katzen
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-08-25· cited 25×
• Jones Ex Rel. Jones v. Roundtree
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1967-01-19· cited 17×
• Fulton v. K & M ASSOCIATES
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-08-25· cited 6×
• Peek v. District of Columbia
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-12-06· cited 2×