Perry v. Sera

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appellant complied with Rule 3(a)’s requirement to designate the judgment or order appealed where it was “clear from the face of the Notice of Appeal” which judgment appellant sought to appeal
• noting that plaintiff was not only personally at fault but had “demonstrated a pattern of noncooperation and dila-toriness”
• noting that defendant was unable to construct defense because of plaintiffs dilatory response to discovery requests
• affirming a denial of a motion to reconsider on similar grounds
• “Noncompliance with court orders ... may cause the system to bog down and may adversely affect other litigants”
• in the context of a party violating discovery orders, court must “consider[] less severe sanctions than dismissal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).