Godfrey v. Ste. Michelle Wine Estates, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Those coming before the court have a fundamental right to an impartial decision-maker.” (citing Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc., 446 U.S. 238, 242, 100 S. Ct. 1610, 64 L. Ed. 2d 182 (1980
• discussing the history of RCW 4.12.040, .050
• “Those coming before the court have a fundamental right to an impartial decision-maker.” (citing Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc., 446 U.S. 238, 242, 100 S. Ct. 1610, 64 L. Ed. 2d 182 (1980) (citing Carey v. Piphus, 435 U.S. 247, 259-62, 266-67, 98 S. Ct. 1042, 55 L. Ed. 2d 252 (1978

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Godfrey v. Ste. Michelle Wine Estates, Ltd.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Godfrey v. Ste. Michelle Wine Estates, Ltd.
  Washington Supreme Court· 2019-06-05· cited 1×
• Godfrey v. Ste. Michelle Wine Estates, Ltd.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2016-07-19