Skip to main content

Godfrey v. State

Citations

  • 365 S.E.2d 93
  • 258 Ga. 28
  • 1988 Ga. LEXIS 134

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • in which the out-of-court statements consisted of “sleep talk,” which the court held to be a phenomenon requiring expert testimony to establish its reliability
  • dream statement by child held admissible under a catchall exception to the hearsay rule
  • while dreams are in some sense connected to waking hour’s desires and anxieties, there is no indication that dream sequences mirror actual events”
  • while dreams are in some sense connected to waking hour’s desires and anxieties, there is no indication that dream sequences mirror actual events”
  • sleep statements do not qualify for hearsay exception for certain statements with “sufficient indicia of reliability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gregory, Marshall, Weltner, Hunt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.