District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 3/29/1973
Gilper v. Kiamesha Concord, Inc.
Citations
- 302 A.2d 740
- 1973 D.C. App. LEXIS 257
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “rule in the District of Columbia is that there can be no recovery for negligently caused mental disturbance or emotional distress ... which is not traceable to a substantial physical injury”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kern, Yeagley, Hood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1982-06-22· cited 399×
- Williams v. BakerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-04-09· cited 149×
- Stewart v. Ford Motor Co.D.C. Circuit· 1977-02-09· cited 56×
- Asuncion v. Columbia Hospital for WomenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1986-09-17· cited 44×
- Rogers v. Loews L'Enfant Plaza HotelDistrict of Columbia· 1981-11-13· cited 36×
- Imogene Williams v. United States Elevator Corporation and Elcon Enterprises, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 1990-12-11· cited 30×
- William J. Garber and John J. Hurley v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1978-05-04· cited 27×
- Leichtman v. KoonsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-06-29· cited 24×
- Sowell v. Hyatt Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1993-05-04· cited 18×
- Washington v. John T. Rhines Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1994-08-29· cited 16×
- Threatt v. WinstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-09-21· cited 15×
- Vickery v. GarretsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1987-05-29· cited 4×
- Garber v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 1976-11-12· cited 4×
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. BurgessDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1973-08-03· cited 2×
- Unnamed caseD.C. Circuit· 1977-05-16
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1945-12-03· cited 18,588×
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court· 1958-10-13· cited 7,025×
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court· 1957-12-16· cited 3,478×
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court· 1941-01-20· cited 3,141×
- Longines-Wittnauer Watch Co. v. Barnes & Reinecke, Inc.New York Court of Appeals· 1965-05-27· cited 557×
- Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co.Supreme Court· 1940-01-29· cited 395×
- Parke-Bernet Galleries, Inc. v. FranklynNew York Court of Appeals· 1970-01-08· cited 325×
- Adam v. SaengerSupreme Court· 1938-01-31· cited 293×
- Loughran v. LoughranSupreme Court· 1934-04-30· cited 183×
- Addabbo v. DonovanSupreme Court· 1965-11-08· cited 164×
- Calagaz v. CalhoonFifth Circuit· 1962-10-10· cited 70×
- Tobin v. Pennsylvania R. Co.D.C. Circuit· 1938-10-24· cited 43×
- Sheila Ilina Boland, Etc. v. J. Spencer LoveD.C. Circuit· 1955-04-07· cited 38×
- Kochenthal v. KochenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1967-07-10· cited 33×
- Roger MacHanic v. Kate StoreyD.C. Circuit· 1963-05-06· cited 17×
- Harrison v. CANADA DRY CORPORATIONDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1968-09-23· cited 8×
- Hull v. GamblinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1968-05-13· cited 8×
- Campbell v. Safeway Stores, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1959-03-20· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.