Gilman v. Schwarzenegger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Proposition 9 eliminated the Board’s discretion to set a one-year deferral period, even if the Board were to find by clear and convincing evidence that a prisoner would be suitable for parole in one year”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pearson v. Muntz
  Ninth Circuit· 2011-04-05· cited 20×
• Richard Gilman v. Edmund Brown, Jr.
  Ninth Circuit· 2016-02-22· cited 15×
• Gilman v. Schwarzenegger
  Ninth Circuit· 2011-01-24· cited 14×
• Gilman v. Brown
  E.D. California· 2014-02-27· cited 3×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2008-11-12· cited 11,986×
• United States v. Hinkson
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-11-05· cited 2,227×
• Munaf v. Geren
  Supreme Court· 2008-06-12· cited 1,360×
• California Department of Corrections v. Morales
  Supreme Court· 1995-04-25· cited 1,142×
• Garner v. Jones
  Supreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 550×
• Hayward v. Marshall
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-04-22· cited 372×
• In re Lawrence
  California Supreme Court· 2008-08-21· cited 300×
• Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc. v. Maxwell-Jolly
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-07-09· cited 94×