Independent Living Center of Southern California, Inc. v. Maxwell-Jolly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the State’s Legislative Analyst was the only “State official” to have “considered— let alone studied” the impact of the rate reduction on services provided to MediCal beneficiaries
• referring to the United States’ certiorari-­stage invitation brief in Belshe v. Orthopaedic Hospital, 522 U. S. 1044 (1998) (denying writ of certiorari)
• referring to the United States’ certiorari-stage invitation brief in Belshe v. Orthopaedic Hospital, 522 U. S. 1044 (1998) (denying writ of certiora- ri)
• “State budgetary considerations do not therefore, in social welfare cases, constitute a critical public interest that would be injured by the grant of preliminary relief.”
• “State budgetary considerations do not therefore, in social welfare cases, constitute a critical public interest that would be injured by the grant of preliminary relief.”
• “State budgetary concerns cannot ... be the conclusive factor in decisions regarding Medicaid.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).