Gilman v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that because a current shareholder was not entitled to vote on the action complained of, he was not entitled to complain that he was not given notice of dissenters' rights
• concluding that because a current shareholder was not entitled to vote on the action complained of, he was not entitled to complain that he was not given notice of dissenters' rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Michalk v. Michalk
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2009-10-20· cited 146×
• Banner Life Insurance v. Mark Wallace Dixson Irrevocable Trust
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2009-04-03· cited 37×
• Danti v. Danti
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2009-03-05· cited 18×
• Edwards v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2013-04-25· cited 14×
• Athay v. Stacey
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2008-10-15· cited 13×
• Borne v. Gonstead Advanced Techniques, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2003-06-19· cited 11×
• Western Home Transport, Inc. v. Idaho Department of Labor
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2014-02-11· cited 5×
• Mark Wallace Dixson Irrevocable Trust v. Tammie Sue Dixson
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2009-04-03