Gillis v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the chain of custody was not satisfied because the State only produced the seizing officer and the chemist but failed to elicit testimony from several additional persons who handled the suspected narcotics

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Best v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-04-27· cited 45×
• Garrett v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-05-09· cited 24×
• Bell v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-02-06· cited 12×
• Lester v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1990-04-03· cited 9×
• Parker v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1987-10-08· cited 9×
• Colesanti v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-10-05· cited 8×
• Thompson v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-11-30· cited 6×
• Martin v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1989-03-06· cited 6×
• Wheeler v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2017-07-03· cited 2×
• Wheeler v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2018-06-25

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Carr v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-02-22· cited 51×
• Leonard v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1980-10-10· cited 37×
• State v. Leonard
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-05-22· cited 30×