Gillis v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that resentencing from a successful rule 3.800 motion did not toll the time for a rule 3.850 motion attacking the defendant's underlying convictions
• finding that defendant’s resentencing, which occurred after direct review proceedings concluded, did not toll two-year time limit for filing Rule 3.850 motion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Russell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-10-26· cited 1×
• EDNOL A. HANNA, I I I v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-09-29

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Robertson v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-10-10· cited 241×
• Marrero v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-31· cited 13×
• O'NEILL v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-02-04· cited 7×
• Ford v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-02-25· cited 2×
• Gillis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-06-28· cited 1×