Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 6/27/2012

Gillingham v. Consol Energy, Inc.

Citations

  • 51 A.3d 841

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that the fact-finder is free to believe all, part, or none of the evidence and to determine the credibility of the witnesses
  • observing that the fact-finder is free to believe all, part, or none of the evidence and to determine the credibility of the witnesses
  • stating plaintiff would have violated his employment contract with Technical Solutions, his direct employer, if he did not sign Consol release
  • engineering expert testimony that rust would have alerted defendant to need for further inspection and that deformation of bolt would not have been caused by the accident was competent
  • “The factfinder is free to believe all, part, or none of the evidence and to determine the credibility of the witnesses.”
  • experts opined that a stairway collapsed because the bolts that secured it to a building had rusted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowes, Olson, Platt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.