Gillespie v. Capitol Reprographics, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the grant of default judgment was improper because the court needed additional information to ascertain the plaintiff’s claim for monetary damages
• concluding that the grant of default judgment was improper because the court needed additional information to ascertain the plaintiff’s claim for monetary damages
• finding grant of default judgment was improper because the court needed additional information to ascertain the plaintiff’s claim for monetary damages
• vacating the grant of default judgment and concluding that additional proof was needed to validate the plaintiff’s claim for monetary damages
• finding plaintiff would be prejudiced by setting aside a default judgment where defendant admitted that it was placed in receivership and was fighting off foreclo sure
• that plaintiffs had already registered their judgment further showed that plaintiffs would be prejudiced if the default judgment was set aside, given the defendant’s alleged insolvency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).