· 7/8/1993
Mark E. O'Brien v. R.J. O'Brien & Associates, Inc.
Citations
- 998 F.2d 1394
- 26 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 251
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 17121
- 1993 WL 252100
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that defendant waived insufficiency of process objection by failing to raise it in motion to vacate default
- finding that the motion made pursuant to Rule 55 “was, in essence, a Rule 12 motion”
- “A signed return of service constitutes prima facie evidence of valid service “‘which can be overcome only by strong and convincing evidence.’” (quoting Hicklin v. Edwards, 226 F.2d 410, 414 (8th Cir.1955)); Homer v. Jones-Bey, 415 F.3d 748, 752 (7th Cir. 2005
- affirming dismissal pursuant to Rule 12(b)(5
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cudahy, Flaum, Kanne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.