· 4/22/2009
Giles v. Chicago Drum, Inc.
Citations
- 631 F. Supp. 2d 981
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34211
- 2009 WL 1098701
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding case even where resolution of the conspiracy claim may interpret and apply RCRA terms governing the lawfulness of defendants’ conduct
- “[U]nder Plaintiffs’ theory, the processing of hazardous waste constitutes both the allegedly agreed-to unlawful conduct and the tortious act in furtherance of the agreement. It may, thus, indeed be necessary to resort to RCRA in deciding Plaintiffs’ conspiracy claim.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rebecca R. Pallmeyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.