Skip to main content
· 4/22/2009

Giles v. Chicago Drum, Inc.

Citations

  • 631 F. Supp. 2d 981
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 34211
  • 2009 WL 1098701

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding case even where resolution of the conspiracy claim may interpret and apply RCRA terms governing the lawfulness of defendants’ conduct
  • “[U]nder Plaintiffs’ theory, the processing of hazardous waste constitutes both the allegedly agreed-to unlawful conduct and the tortious act in furtherance of the agreement. It may, thus, indeed be necessary to resort to RCRA in deciding Plaintiffs’ conspiracy claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rebecca R. Pallmeyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.