Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “general allegations of compensation or the size of previous sales
• explaining that a party with no duty to speak on a particular topic must nevertheless make a full disclosure when it chooses to speak
• finding that denial of leave to amend based on futility was appropriate where the plaintiff provided no explanation of “how it would amend the complaint to add particularity”
• stating that plaintiffs failed to explain how they would amend the pleading, and finding motion to dismiss was properly granted
• finding that sales by resigning officer “should not materially impact the scienter analysis” because it is “not unusual for individuals leaving a company . . . to sell shares”
• finding that sales by resigning officer “should not materially impact the scienter analysis” because it is “not unusual for individuals leaving a company . . . to sell shares”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).