Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 7/12/2005
Giddins v. State
Citations
- 878 A.2d 687
- 163 Md. App. 322
- 2005 Md. App. LEXIS 98
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing the purpose of double jeopardy as protection of the defendant’s right to have the trial completed by the original tribunal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Salmon, Meredith, Moylan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. FauciSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-04-10· cited 161×
- Giddins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-05-12· cited 24×
- Moore v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2011-05-02· cited 21×
- In Re Kevin E.Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-01-03· cited 8×
- In Re Roneika S.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-04-03· cited 8×
- People v. BennettAppellate Court of Illinois· 2013-07-03· cited 7×
- Marquise Deshawn Flynn v. State of Alabama. (Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court: CC-18-1178).Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2024-02-09
- Santana v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2026-04-28
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.