Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 12/22/2006
Gibson v. Gibson
Citations
- 211 S.W.3d 601
- 2006 Ky. App. LEXIS 390
- 2006 WL 3751413
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Child support is a statutory duty intended to benefit the children, rather than the parents.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Johnson, Taylor, Huddleston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Seeger v. LanhamMissouri Court of Appeals· 2018-03-22· cited 47×
- Sidell v. SidellSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2011-04-19· cited 29×
- Castro v. HaughCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-04-24· cited 21×
- Lichtenstein v. BarbanelKentucky Supreme Court· 2010-05-20· cited 18×
- Sallee v. SalleeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2015-06-05· cited 7×
- Marriage of Wareham v. WarehamCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-12-07· cited 6×
- Aragorn LaFayette Earls v. Jill Andrea MendozaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2011-08-10
- Jessica Hooper McQuade (now Burnett) v. Michael Vincent McQuadeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2010-11-30
- Koerner v. KoernerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2008-10-17
- Neighbors v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2016-04-08
- Kenneth L. Berry v. Bay, Ltd.Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2022-03-03
- Sharon Lanham v. Harry L. SeegerKentucky Supreme Court· 2018-03-22
- Ashley Nicole Harney (Now McConathy) v. Stuart Austin HarneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2024-11-15
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kuprion v. FitzgeraldKentucky Supreme Court· 1994-11-28· cited 71×
- Jurado v. BrashearSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2001-03-19· cited 42×
- Sherfey v. SherfeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2002-01-18· cited 39×
- Zaabel v. KonetskiIllinois Supreme Court· 2004-03-11· cited 38×
- Clay v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1986-04-04· cited 27×
- Stewart v. RaikesKentucky Supreme Court· 1982-02-16· cited 21×
- In the Interest of B.O.G.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2001-05-02· cited 21×
- Youssefi v. YoussefiNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2000-02-03· cited 18×
- Etter v. EtterCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 2001-01-16· cited 18×
- Price v. PriceKentucky Supreme Court· 1995-12-21· cited 14×
- Young v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1972-02-04· cited 14×
- In Re the Marriage of MyersCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2002-11-08· cited 14×
- Hardin v. HardinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1986-06-13· cited 13×
- Mauk v. MaukCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1994-03-04· cited 13×
- Cohen v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-04-03· cited 12×
- Gaines v. GainesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1978-05-26· cited 10×
- Raymer v. RaymerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1988-05-13· cited 8×
- In Re the Marriage of AbplanalpCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2000-07-28· cited 7×
- Thurman v. Commonwealth, Cabinet for Human Resources, ex rel. ThurmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1992-03-27· cited 6×
- Hoskins v. HoskinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2000-03-31· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.