Castro v. Haugh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[C]ourt did not have continuing, exclusive jurisdiction to modify the original child-support order after the individual parties and their child moved to other states and did not consent in writing to California’s continuing jurisdiction or authority over the case.”
• “[C]ourt did not have continuing, exclusive jurisdiction to modify the original child-support order after the individual parties and their child moved to other states and did not consent in writing to California’s continuing jurisdiction or authority over the case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).