Gibney v. PILLIFANT

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he actual language used in the contract is the best evidence of the intent of the parties, and the plain meaning of that language controls.”
• “Absent an ambiguity, the actual language used in the contract is the best evidence of the intent of the parties, and the plain meaning of that language controls.”
• “Absent an ambiguity, the actual language used in the contract is the best evidence of the intent of the parties, and the plain meaning of that language controls.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).