Waksman Enterprises, Inc. v. Oregon Properties, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that appellee properly conceded that where appellant raised an issue for the first time in his motion for rehearing in a summary judgment proceeding, \the point was properly presented to the trial court . . . and thus preserved for appellate review\
• \[T]he law does not require that a party to a contract take action that would clearly be futile\
• “[T]he law does not require that a party to a contract take action that would be clearly futile.”
• “[T]he law does not require that a party to a contract take action that would clearly be futile”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).