G.G. v. Karen Grindle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding the lower court’s denial of remittitur of a $250,000 compensatory damage jury verdict against a school principal who failed to stop a music teacher from inappropriately touching the fifth-grade plaintiff over the clothes on her breast and the middle of her thigh
• “Great deference must be given to the jury’s verdict, because…the jury [is] in a superior position to find facts and determine a proper damages award.”
• great deference should be given to the jury’s verdict because the jury “is in a superior position to determine a proper damages award”
• “Great deference must be given to the jury’s verdict, because...the jury [is] in a superior position to find facts and determine a proper damages award.”
• jury awarded $7,250 in punitive damages against a school principal who failed to stop a music teacher from inappropriately touching a student on her breast and thigh

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).