Jennifer Farfaras v. Citizens Bank and Trust of Chicago, a Corporation, Robert Michael, George Michael, and Nicholas Tanglis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, “[m]edical support is not necessary to prove emotional injury in a Title VII case”
• holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing layperson to describe the plaintiff’s mental condition as “depressed”
• holding that the plaintiff's admission on cross-examination in an employment discrimination case that she did not go to work right away was \not sufficient to demonstrate that the defense had raised the issue of failure to mitigate\
• holding that continuous sexual harass- ment by three superiors constituted extremely reprehensible conduct
• holding that continuous sexual harass- ment by three superiors constituted extremely reprehensible conduct
• holding that continuous sexual harass- ment by three superiors constituted extremely reprehensible conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).