Skip to main content
D. Maine· 11/4/1985

Gestetner Corp. v. Case Equipment Co.

Citations

  • 108 F.R.D. 138
  • 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • although existence or degree of prejudice to party opposing modification of scheduling order might supply reasons to deny motion to modify, focus of inquiry is on moving party’s reasons for seeking modification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.